First, the United States and its allies must leverage the full range of air, space, and cyber power in proactive ways to create dilemmas and uncertainty for the Chinese government and, if necessary, impose costs. 3 This article interprets the framework as application (ideas), technology (tools), and organization (groups). Holley’s classic framework on the evolution of warfare as relating to either ideas, tools, or groups. Each of these imperatives is best understood through I. 1 In his statement, Admiral Davidson stated that “ adversaries are pursuing their objectives between peace and war USINDOPACOM must compete in the gray zone.” 2 As national security practitioners, we ask: What are the imperatives to enable this kind of competition within the gray zone? Specific to air, space, and cyber power, the United States must apply new ideas, innovate new technology, and reorganize its forces to meet the imperatives of the gray zone. The article’s conclusion is that air power remains fundamental to the British way of war in post-Cold War conflict, as it has since the First World War.In 2019, the commander of US Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM), Admiral Phillip Davidson, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee regarding the theater’s command posture. The article concludes by contending the intervention in Libya is an example of liberal militarism and continuation of the British way of war. The third section critically analyses the argument deployed before the SDSR that unitary, land-centric conflict would predominate and therefore Britain’s armed forces needed rebalancing. The article then questions the notion that air power has limited utility in counter-insurgency by examining Britain’s use of air power as part of a liberal militarist approach to counter-insurgency. The article starts with a synoptic examination of the utility of air power in what David Edgerton has called liberal militarism, enabling Britain to avoid bloody and expensive land conflict by using economic, technical and industrial superiority. "This article seeks to add to the post-Cold War character of conflict debate by putting air power, its attractiveness to liberal democracies and the subsequent British way of war, in both conventional war and counter-insurgency, into historical context. Finally, the study suggests that a strictly strategic employment maturity, in view of the participation not only of the air force at the strategic level but also of the Land Force at the operational and tactical level in the recent fighting, the capacity of the Army Aviation means to provide the necessary support to the surface troops, thus reinforcing the capabilities of the Ground Force. It is suggested the potential of organizational innovation, influencing the restructuring and the business model of the Land Force. With a qualitative bias, the research method used was the deductive and bibliographical basis, supported by content analysis, proposing a reflection on Air Power, essentially, it seeks to broaden the horizon regarding the propositions of Douhet, Mitchell, Seversky and Warden, demonstrating Army Aviation action at the operational and tactical levels. This is a reflection on the application of Air Power, particularly with the Land Force, addressing its ability to conduct modern combat and guarantee success in war, due to the flexibility of air assets.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |